According to a recent CNN/USA Today/Gallop poll, 50% of Americans believe it is OK for the government to forgo warrants when ordering electronic surveillance of American citizens. According to a story in the Washington Post, the FBI has opened preliminary terrorist investigations on several groups, including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), Greenpeace, the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). Yes, you read that right.
Preliminary terrorist investiations into PETA and the ACLU. Even more recently, the US government has requested information from several internet search companies, information that is most definitely in the grey area between public and private information. All of the companies have complied except for Google, who plans to bring the request to court in an attempt to fight it.
Of everything that I said in the above paragraph, you know what bothers me the most? The first sentence - 50% of Americans believe it is OK for the government to forgo warrants when ordering electronic surveillance of American citizens. No! No, damn it, no! There is a reason we have a a bill of rights. It isn't there to look pretty, it serves a very real, very important purpose - the protection of US citizens from unfair treatment by the government. I realize there is a fine line between safety and privacy, but wiretapping without a court order? That is
absolutely unacceptable! Why can't they get a court order? If there is a justifiable reason a person or organization should be monitored, then it is a simple matter to get a court order. The only reasons I can see for the government doing what it is doing is: (i) They don't have a justifiable reason, or (ii) They are lazy. If it is the latter, then that is the worst damn reason I have ever heard. And if it is the former, which I suspect it is, then I am disgusted. Absolutely disgusted.
Maybe some of the people they are monitoring without court orders are actually terrorists that they just don't have enough evidence against. That is certainly possible. But the added benefit of possibly stopping some sort of terrorist attack is not at all worth the cost of loss of freedom and privacy. I don't care if it is me that dies in the attack that wasn't stopped because there was no court order, if it was my family, or if it was every friend I've ever had. That would be a terrible tragedy, but giving up our freedom and privacy to an overbearing, all-seeing, and all-knowing government the likes of which a certain book with a certain title that sounds something like
1984 wrote about is an even greater tragedy. Americans love to preach about their love of freedom and their duty to spread freedom and democracy to the rest of the world, but we are apparently blind to the fact that we are giving up those very freedoms more and more every day to an administration that, in Hillary Clinton's words, is one of the worst we have ever had.
As each month passes, I find myself less and less proud to be an American than the month before. I take no pride in our supposed democracy, because we do not have a democracy, we have some weird combination of an oligarcy and an aristocracy. I take no pride in the illegal and unjust war we have waged these past few years. I take no pride in our disgusting consumption of the world's resources. I take no pride in our blatant disregard for the enviroment. I take no pride in our apathy towards those that are unable to afford their own health care.
Never has my desire to leave America and never come back been stronger.
And now to switch gears, here is the picture-of-the-entry. Something different this time, I'm taking a break from Hawaii pictures. This is my parents' house, all lit up for Christmas and surrounded by the void of night.